-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
well,
i'm not sure about how your problem of `having ownership of the user as well
as group ownership of group dba on newly created files` be accomplished.
But, if you do give a umask of 007, any other user who is the member of the
group dba will be able to rwx the file..
This generally happens to be the requirement.
I'll try adding my problem to this thread too. taking it more deep, if there
are 10 groups at my system with say 20 users in each group where as there are
50 common users in all the groups. Now I have a development directory say,
/devel/
to which i need to give some people read access(code verifiers), write
access(coders), and execute access(beta testers). Also I need some to have rw
access(verify + correct) and so on many more conditions..
Since more than a year before I raised this question on both the rhlist and
lih, i got few answers stating to use ACL's. Now has anyone implemented it or
any pointers towards it...
rrs
On Friday 22 August 2003 14:15, Vijay Kumar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have created about 4 users, each of them have a seperate group.
> They are also a part of secondary group ( dba)
> There is in directory which has 770 permission and which is owned by one
> of the users and the dba. Any file/directry created under this
> directory should be owned by the respective user with "dba" as the group
> owner. Any tips on how to achieve this ?
>
> Please help.
>
> Regrads,
> Vijay.
>
- --
Ritesh Raj Sarraf.
RESEARCHUT.
PH: 91-11-35207042
www.researchut.com
===================================================================================================================
OH! A FORTUNE.
[Astrology is] 100 percent hokum, Ted. As a matter of fact, the first edition
of the Encyclopaedia Britannica, written in 1771 -- 1771! -- said that this
belief system is a subject long ago ridiculed and reviled. We're dealing with
beliefs that go back to the ancient Babylonians. There's nothing there....
It sounds a lot like science, it sounds like astronomy. It's got technical
terms. It's got jargon. It confuses the public....The astrologer is quite
glib, confuses the public, uses terms which come from science, come from
metaphysics, come from a host of fields, but they really mean nothing. The
fact is that astrological beliefs go back at least 2,500 years. Now that
should be a sufficiently long time for astrologers to prove their case. They
have not proved their case....It's just simply gibberish. The fact is,
there's
no theory for it, there are no observational data for it. It's been tested
and tested over the centuries. Nobody's ever found any validity to it at
all. It is not even close to a science. A science has to be repeatable, it
has to have a logical foundation, and it has to be potentially vulnerable --
you test it. And in that astrology is reqlly quite something else.
- -- Astronomer Richard Berendzen, President, American University, on ABC
News "Nightline," May 3, 1988
-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/RUXe4Rhi6gTxMLwRAo+cAJ9OY5xprR26wJhgw/RKAcTdn/JYAQCfYoVk
OiYJqKeGv3DWCj+XmUFFTnA=
=mWqz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine.
WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines
at the same time. Free trial click here:http://www.vmware.com/wl/offer/358/0
_______________________________________________
linux-india-help mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-india-help
