On Monday 22 December 2003 19:42, Binand Sethumadhavan wrote: > On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 07:06:12PM +0530, Mukund Deshmukh wrote: > > Are there any compact, standalone (not using inetd) and NOT requiring > > PAM, ftpd server, > > wu-ftpd?
Wouldn't proftpd a better choice?in particular given security track record of wu-ftpd? Shridhar ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click _______________________________________________ linux-india-help mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-india-help
