Tue, 29 Apr 2014 09:19:27 -0700 от Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>: > On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 08:03:40PM +0400, Alexander Shiyan wrote: > > Tue, 29 Apr 2014 08:50:32 -0700 от Dmitry Torokhov > > <[email protected]>: > > > On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 08:43:48AM +0400, Alexander Shiyan wrote: > > > > Mon, 28 Apr 2014 20:26:00 -0700 от Dmitry Torokhov > > > > <[email protected]>: > > > > > Hi Alexander, > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 09:53:13AM +0400, Alexander Shiyan wrote: > > > > > > Replace existing resource handling in the driver with managed > > > > > > device resource, this ensures more consistent error values and > > > > > > simplifies error paths. > > > > > > kzalloc -> devm_kzalloc > > > > > > gpio_request_one -> devm_gpio_request_one > > ... > > > > > @@ -162,8 +160,7 @@ static struct gpio_keys_platform_data > > > > > *gpio_keys_polled_get_devtree_pdata(struct > > > > > if (of_property_read_u32(pp, "linux,code", > > > > > &button->code)) { > > > > > dev_err(dev, "Button without keycode: 0x%x\n", > > > > > button->gpio); > > > > > - error = -EINVAL; > > > > > - goto err_free_pdata; > > > > > + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); > > > > > } > > > > > > > > We can even use return value from of_property_read_u32() on error. > > > > > > > > All other looks OK. > > > > > > Do you have hardware that uses gpio_keys_polled? > > > > Yes. > > So did you have a chance to actually try my version(s)? I would feel > much better if you had ;)
Unfortunately, due to the large following weekends, I cannot do it earlier than 2 weeks. ---
