Erik Moore wrote :
>
> I read that Jean does not want to hear about anything lower than
> 2.4.16 but upgrading the kernel on the PDA is something we would like
> to avoid since we want to put these PDAs in the customer's hands.
How much do you want it to work ? Most of my work has been
"bug fixes", so it's at your own risk...
> 11:46:31.993063 snrm:cmd ca=fe pf=1 11f6d653 < 663efa52 new-ca=0e (32)
> 11:46:32.003063 ua:rsp ca=0e pf=1 11f6d653 > 663efa52 (31)
> 11:46:32.083063 rr:cmd < ca=0e pf=1 nr=0 (2)
> 11:46:32.093063 i:rsp > ca=0e pf=1 nr=0 ns=0 LM slsap=23 dlsap=00 CONN_CMD (6)
> 11:46:32.103063 i:cmd < ca=0e pf=0 nr=1 ns=0 LM slsap=57 dlsap=00 CONN_CMD (6)
> 11:46:32.103063 i:cmd < ca=0e pf=1 nr=1 ns=1 LM slsap=00 dlsap=23 CONN_RSP (6)
> 11:46:32.113063 i:rsp > ca=0e pf=0 nr=2 ns=1 LM slsap=00 dlsap=57 CONN_RSP (6)
> 11:46:32.113063 i:rsp > ca=0e pf=1 nr=2 ns=2 LM slsap=23 dlsap=00
>GET_VALUE_BY_CLASS: "IrDA:IrCOMM" "Parameters" (28)
> 11:46:32.133063 i:cmd < ca=0e pf=0 nr=3 ns=2 LM slsap=57 dlsap=00
>GET_VALUE_BY_CLASS: "IrDA:IrCOMM" "Parameters" (28)
> 11:46:32.133063 i:cmd < ca=0e pf=1 nr=3 ns=3 LM slsap=00 dlsap=23
>GET_VALUE_BY_CLASS: Success N/A (19)
> 11:46:32.143063 i:rsp > ca=0e pf=0 nr=4 ns=3 LM slsap=00 dlsap=57
>GET_VALUE_BY_CLASS: Success N/A (19)
Known bug. The patch is on my web page and called "Discovery
fixes". Apply it on the computer side (receiver). You may need to
upgrade to have the patch go cleanly.
The Zaurus may be OK without it, because before 2.4.13, this
bug was more difficult to trigger.
Jean
_______________________________________________
Linux-IrDA mailing list - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pasta.cs.UiT.No/mailman/listinfo/linux-irda
