On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 09:24 -0400, Robin Getz wrote: > On Mon 28 Sep 2009 21:59, graff.yang pondered: > > On Mon, 2009-09-28 at 15:17 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 05:21, <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Revision 7489 Author gyang Date 2009-09-28 05:21:51 -0400 (Mon, 28 > > Sep 2009) > > > > > > > > Log Message > > > > > > > > seperate defines about l1 code/cache and code only sram > > > > > > why ? the entire point was that treating it as one contiguous blob > > > > Task [#4788], dsp-bridge may write code to l1, it's dangerous, if there > > is a gap between COREB_L1_CODE_START to COREB_L1_CODE_START + > > L1_CODE_LENGTH. > > Before we have a spec that everyone agrees to - we should not be making > changes to kernel code that is going to slow down all accesses on every part. OK, I'd revert this change soon.
> > See the comments on the task tracked for more info. > _______________________________________________ Linux-kernel-commits mailing list [email protected] https://blackfin.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-kernel-commits
