On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 12:16:47PM -0800, tip-bot for Dave Hansen wrote:
> Commit-ID:  35e97790f5f1e5cf2b5522c55e3e31d5c81bd226
> Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/35e97790f5f1e5cf2b5522c55e3e31d5c81bd226
> Author:     Dave Hansen <[email protected]>
> AuthorDate: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 13:02:00 -0800
> Committer:  Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
> CommitDate: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 10:11:13 +0100
> 
> x86/mm/pkeys: Add Kconfig option
> 
> I don't have a strong opinion on whether we need a Kconfig prompt
> or not.  Protection Keys has relatively little code associated
> with it, and it is not a heavyweight feature to keep enabled.
> However, I can imagine that folks would still appreciate being
> able to disable it.
> 
> Note that, with disabled-features.h, the checks in the code
> for protection keys are always the same:
> 
>       cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_PKU)
> 
> With the config option disabled, this essentially turns into an

whoops, something is missing here. An "#ifdef."

...

>  arch/x86/Kconfig | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> index ab2ed53..3632cdd 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> @@ -1714,6 +1714,10 @@ config X86_INTEL_MPX
>  
>         If unsure, say N.
>  
> +config X86_INTEL_MEMORY_PROTECTION_KEYS
> +     def_bool y

This is not necessary.

---
From: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 12:19:50 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] x86/mm/pkeys: Do not enable them by default

No need to default to y.

Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
---
 arch/x86/Kconfig | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
index d10826d2cb5e..109bc46ccb60 100644
--- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
@@ -1719,8 +1719,7 @@ config X86_INTEL_MPX
          If unsure, say N.
 
 config X86_INTEL_MEMORY_PROTECTION_KEYS
-       prompt "Intel Memory Protection Keys"
-       def_bool y
+       bool "Intel Memory Protection Keys"
        # Note: only available in 64-bit mode
        depends on CPU_SUP_INTEL && X86_64
        ---help---
-- 
2.3.5

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.

Reply via email to