On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 08:55:38PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Apr 2016, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > > +#define MSR_IA32_RTIT_ADDR0_A            0x00000580
> > > +#define MSR_IA32_RTIT_ADDR0_B            0x00000581
> > > +#define MSR_IA32_RTIT_ADDR1_A            0x00000582
> > > +#define MSR_IA32_RTIT_ADDR1_B            0x00000583
> > > +#define MSR_IA32_RTIT_ADDR2_A            0x00000584
> > > +#define MSR_IA32_RTIT_ADDR2_B            0x00000585
> > > +#define MSR_IA32_RTIT_ADDR3_A            0x00000586
> > > +#define MSR_IA32_RTIT_ADDR3_B            0x00000587
> > 
> > So can we not turn msr-index.h a dumping ground for MSRs pls?
> > 
> > If those are only PT-relevant, why not define them all in pt.h?
> 
> I have to disagree here. The MSRs itself can really go into msr-index.h while
> the bit definitions might go elsewhere. What's wrong with having all MSRs at a
> central place?

So I agree with Thomas; the risk of not doing this is that we'll
introduce the same MSR again, in another file, under another name.

That's confusion we can do without.

Reply via email to