On Thu, 21 Apr 2016, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 08:55:38PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > I have to disagree here. The MSRs itself can really go into msr-index.h
> > while
> > the bit definitions might go elsewhere. What's wrong with having all MSRs
> > at a
> > central place?
>
> Same reason as for pci_ids.h - to contain only MSRs which are used in
> multiple compilation units.
That's really not the same thing. pci ids are issued by a gazillion of vendors
for a bazillion of different devices. There is no consistent view for them.
MSRs on the other hand are x86 specific registers nicely defined in the
SDM/APM and having at least the MSR defines in a single header makes a lot of
sense.
Thanks,
tglx
