From: Thierry Reding <[email protected]>

When registering a GPIO chip, drivers can override the device tree node
associated with the chip by setting the chip's ->of_node field. If set,
this field is supposed to take precedence over the ->parent->of_node
field, but the code doesn't actually do that.

Commit 762c2e46c059 ("gpio: of: remove of_gpiochip_and_xlate() and
struct gg_data") exposes this because it now no longer matches on the
GPIO chip's ->of_node field, but the GPIO device's ->of_node field that
is set using the procedure described above.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 9 +++++----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
index 47a3cc0e437b..eae7664b2723 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
@@ -1047,13 +1047,14 @@ int gpiochip_add_data(struct gpio_chip *chip, void 
*data)
        if (chip->parent) {
                gdev->dev.parent = chip->parent;
                gdev->dev.of_node = chip->parent->of_node;
-       } else {
+       }
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_OF_GPIO
        /* If the gpiochip has an assigned OF node this takes precedence */
-               if (chip->of_node)
-                       gdev->dev.of_node = chip->of_node;
+       if (chip->of_node)
+               gdev->dev.of_node = chip->of_node;
 #endif
-       }
+
        gdev->id = ida_simple_get(&gpio_ida, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
        if (gdev->id < 0) {
                status = gdev->id;
-- 
2.8.3

Reply via email to