Hi Linus, On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 14:45:53 -0700 Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Actually, the perf tree on its own was enough to trigger the build > > problem, the luto-next tree was just what initially triggered the build > > failure in linux-next (I guess there is some missing dependency). > > After the build failed, I started including the perf tree directly > > before the tip tree and the build would fail when I merged that ... > > Ugh. It's merged in my tree now, because I thought it was ok. Can > somebody point me to the fix?
I only affects cross building of the objtool and vdso2c tools (which is how I work). The latest version of the perf/core branch in the tip tree now has all the fixes, so I assume that Ingo will send another pull request. Unfortunately, that means that your tree is broken for me this morning ... but I will cope, I guess. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell
