* Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > That is why I sent this without mentioning the conflict. Is there any
> > > other
> > > complication that I missed?
> >
> > Actually, the perf tree on its own was enough to trigger the build problem,
> > the luto-next tree was just what initially triggered the build failure in
> > linux-next (I guess there is some missing dependency). After the build
> > failed,
> > I started including the perf tree directly before the tip tree and the
> > build
> > would fail when I merged that ...
>
> Now that this is fixed and merged into the tip tree, I have removed the perf
> tree from linux-next.
Ok, thanks - and sorry about this - I'll get the tooling fixes to Linus ASAP.
Thanks,
Ingo
