On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 06:30:15PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 05:52:50PM +0100, luis.olive...@synopsys.com wrote:
> > -           is_slave = device_property_read_bool(&pdev->dev, "isslave");
> Which tree is this based on? I cant see the existing isslave property in
> mainline HEAD (commit 29fbff8698fc0ac1).

Same surprise here. Because I likely would have NAKed the binding.

Why is it needed? Doesn't the driver allow to be master/slave on the
same bus?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to