On Tue, 2018-02-13 at 18:18 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > We're going to need the percpu.h fix too, and I'd also like to see the > > status of the i915 build failure you mentioned. Is there a bug filed > > for that already, and is it on the blocker list for 6.0? If not, why > > not? > > > For my part I completely forgot about it :-(. Did you expect me to file a bug > ? > If so, I'll need to retest and try to figure out how to do that. Let me know; > I should be able to get that done tomorrow.
I *thought* you had mentioned that it didn't build; in that case absolutely, I expected there to be a bug filed already. As a general rule, nobody should *ever* mention that something is broken, without first ensuring the bug is filed. Looking back, I can't now see where you said that; maybe I made it up and I only observed this failure myself. Either way, I already filed https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36378 after searching bugzilla and not finding it. Thanks.
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature