On Tue, 2018-02-13 at 18:18 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> 
> > We're going to need the percpu.h fix too, and I'd also like to see the
> > status of the i915 build failure you mentioned. Is there a bug filed
> > for that already, and is it on the blocker list for 6.0? If not, why
> > not?
> > 
> For my part I completely forgot about it :-(. Did you expect me to file a bug 
> ?
> If so, I'll need to retest and try to figure out how to do that. Let me know;
> I should be able to get that done tomorrow.

I *thought* you had mentioned that it didn't build; in that case
absolutely, I expected there to be a bug filed already. As a general
rule, nobody should *ever* mention that something is broken, without
first ensuring the bug is filed.

Looking back, I can't now see where you said that; maybe I made it up
and I only observed this failure myself. Either way, I already filed
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36378 after searching bugzilla
and not finding it.

Thanks.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to