On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 01:09:29PM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-02-13 at 18:18 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > We're going to need the percpu.h fix too, and I'd also like to see the
> > > status of the i915 build failure you mentioned. Is there a bug filed
> > > for that already, and is it on the blocker list for 6.0? If not, why
> > > not?
> > >
> > For my part I completely forgot about it :-(. Did you expect me to file a
> > bug ?
> > If so, I'll need to retest and try to figure out how to do that. Let me
> > know;
> > I should be able to get that done tomorrow.
> I *thought* you had mentioned that it didn't build; in that case
> absolutely, I expected there to be a bug filed already. As a general
> rule, nobody should *ever* mention that something is broken, without
> first ensuring the bug is filed.
> Looking back, I can't now see where you said that; maybe I made it up
> and I only observed this failure myself. Either way, I already filed
I found it in my e-mail logs, so it definitely was me. Or maybe both
of us in parallel.
> https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36378 after searching bugzilla
> and not finding it.