On 3/20/18, 07:58, "Andy Lutomirski" <l...@kernel.org> wrote: > The original version of these patches (mine and Andi’s) didn’t have > this comparison, didn’t need RDMSR, and didn’t allow malicious user To be clear, RDMSR is not needed (with FSGSBASE)
- RE: [PATCH 13/15] x86/fsgsbase/64: With FSGSBASE, compare ... David Laight
- Re: [PATCH 13/15] x86/fsgsbase/64: With FSGSBASE, com... H. Peter Anvin
- Re: [PATCH 13/15] x86/fsgsbase/64: With FSGSBASE,... Bae, Chang Seok
- Re: [PATCH 13/15] x86/fsgsbase/64: With FSGSBASE,... Andy Lutomirski
- Re: [PATCH 13/15] x86/fsgsbase/64: With FSGSB... H. Peter Anvin
- Re: [PATCH 13/15] x86/fsgsbase/64: With FSGSBASE, com... Andy Lutomirski
- Re: [PATCH 13/15] x86/fsgsbase/64: With FSGSBASE,... Bae, Chang Seok
- Re: [PATCH 13/15] x86/fsgsbase/64: With FSGSB... Bae, Chang Seok
- Re: [PATCH 13/15] x86/fsgsbase/64: With FSGSBASE,... H. Peter Anvin
- Re: [PATCH 13/15] x86/fsgsbase/64: With FSGSB... Andy Lutomirski