On Mon, 28 May 2018, Herbert Xu wrote:
I don't really see why we need these WARN_ONs. The problem should
be quite obvious when you're writing your code.
If you really want them perhaps add them to the ipc code instead?
Well, I don't really _want_ them; nor does the ipc code which already
does a WARN_ON() (but that goes away in future patches). What I want
is to get rid of the return path. So I don't really care if we convert
them to WARN or remove them altogether. Would you be happy with the
later?
Thanks,
Davidlohr
