Hi Josh, On Sunday, 7 October 2018 14:35:14 EEST Josh Triplett wrote: > On Sun, Oct 07, 2018 at 10:51:02AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > Providing an explicit list of discrimination factors may give the false > > impression that discrimination based on other unlisted factors would be > > allowed. > > > > Avoid any ambiguity by removing the list, to ensure "a harassment-free > > experience for everyone", period. > > I would suggest reading the commit message that added this in the first > place. "Explicit guidelines have demonstrated success in other projects > and other areas of the kernel." See also various comparisons of codes of > conduct, which make the same point. The point of this list is precisely > to serve as one such explicit guideline; removing it would rather defeat > the purpose. > > In any case, this is not the appropriate place for such patches, any > more than it's the place for patches to the GPL.
So what's an appropriate place to discuss the changes that we would like, *together*, to make to the current document and propose upstream ? As stated in another e-mail in a similar thread, I believe we need to come together and decide on what we want to do. We still have no official forum to do so, and repeatedly telling people that ksummit-discuss and LKML are not the right place won't make the concerns go away. Only by discussing problems will we come to solutions. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart