Hi Borut,
Please remove unused "flags" variable declaration.
Erwan.
On 6/4/19 3:55 PM, Erwan LE RAY wrote:
>
>> Hi Borut,
>>
>> Please add the following line in the commit message (before your
>> sign-off) in a V2 of your patch:
>>
>> Fixes: 1bcda09d291081 ("serial: stm32: add support for RS485 hardware
>> control mode")
>>
>> I'm OK with the patch itself.
>>
>> Erwan.
>>
>>
>> Subject: [PATCH] serial: stm32: fix a recursive locking in
>>> stm32_config_rs485
>>> Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2019 11:54:51 +0200
>>> From: Borut Seljak <[email protected]>
>>> CC: Maxime Coquelin <[email protected]>, Alexandre Torgue
>>> <[email protected]>, Greg Kroah-Hartman
>>> <[email protected]>, [email protected],
>>> [email protected], [email protected], Jiri Slaby
>>> <[email protected]>, [email protected],
>>> [email protected]
>>>
>>> Remove spin_lock_irqsave in stm32_config_rs485, it cause recursive
>>> locking.
>>> Already locked in uart_set_rs485_config.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Borut Seljak <[email protected]>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/tty/serial/stm32-usart.c | 2 --
>>> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/stm32-usart.c
>>> b/drivers/tty/serial/stm32-usart.c
>>> index e8d7a7bb4339..da373a465f51 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/stm32-usart.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/stm32-usart.c
>>> @@ -107,7 +107,6 @@ static int stm32_config_rs485(struct uart_port
>>> *port,
>>> bool over8;
>>> unsigned long flags;
- unsigned long flags;
>>> - spin_lock_irqsave(&port->lock, flags);
>>> stm32_clr_bits(port, ofs->cr1, BIT(cfg->uart_enable_bit));
>>> port->rs485 = *rs485conf;
>>> @@ -147,7 +146,6 @@ static int stm32_config_rs485(struct uart_port
>>> *port,
>>> }
>>> stm32_set_bits(port, ofs->cr1, BIT(cfg->uart_enable_bit));
>>> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&port->lock, flags);
>>> return 0;
>>> }
