Am 23. August 2019 16:56:13 MESZ schrieb Matthias Brugger <matthias....@gmail.com>: >are you sure that you provide the correct chip_id here? I saw 0x2023 >(if I >remember correctly), while this switch checks for 0x23, 0x91 and 0x97, >so I'm >not sure if the problem really lies here. I didn't dig into the code to >find out >how the chip_id is created. The chip-id 0x2023 is reported with 5.3-rc5, next-code says 0x0. So i guess the chipid is read out/calculated the wrong way. If calculation is not changed the read is changed compared to 5.3
- [PATCH v5 00/10] Add Support for MediaTek PMIC MT6358 Hsin-Hsiung Wang
- [PATCH v5 08/10] arm64: dts: mt6358: add PMIC MT6358... Hsin-Hsiung Wang
- [PATCH v5 06/10] mfd: Add support for the MediaTek M... Hsin-Hsiung Wang
- [PATCH v5 10/10] rtc: mt6397: Add support for the Me... Hsin-Hsiung Wang
- [PATCH v5 04/10] dt-bindings: mfd: Add compatible fo... Hsin-Hsiung Wang
- [PATCH v5 07/10] regulator: mt6358: Add support for ... Hsin-Hsiung Wang
- [PATCH v5 02/10] mfd: mt6397: extract irq related co... Hsin-Hsiung Wang
- [BUG] [PATCH v5 02/10] mfd: mt6397: extract irq ... Frank Wunderlich
- Re: [BUG] [PATCH v5 02/10] mfd: mt6397: extr... Matthias Brugger
- Re: [BUG] [PATCH v5 02/10] mfd: mt6397: ... Frank Wunderlich
- Re: [BUG] [PATCH v5 02/10] mfd: mt6... Matthias Brugger
- Aw: Re: [BUG] [PATCH v5 02/10] ... Frank Wunderlich
- Re: [BUG] [PATCH v5 02/10] mfd: mt6397: ... Frank Wunderlich
- Re: [BUG] [PATCH v5 02/10] mfd: mt6397: ... Frank Wunderlich
- Re: [PATCH v5 02/10] mfd: mt6397: extract irq re... Matthias Brugger
- [PATCH v5 01/10] mfd: mt6397: clean up code Hsin-Hsiung Wang
- [PATCH v5 05/10] regulator: Add document for MT6358 ... Hsin-Hsiung Wang
- [PATCH v5 09/10] rtc: mt6397: fix alarm register ove... Hsin-Hsiung Wang
- Re: [PATCH v5 09/10] rtc: mt6397: fix alarm regi... Matthias Brugger
- [PATCH v5 03/10] mfd: mt6397: modify suspend/resume ... Hsin-Hsiung Wang