On Mon, 2020-10-12 at 19:31 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 10:17:56AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > > Workie here. This is against -next. > > Nevermind - I had an old version in that branch. > > What I mind to, however, is: > > "adding a mechanism to only emit the message once per patched file (Joe)" > > This needs to happen for every .byte line which doesn't have a comment > documenting the binutils version.
Why? I think it unnecessary. It's noisy and would also be duplicative in the code. /* binutils version x.y */ #define __ASM_CLAC ".byte 0x0f,0x01,0xca" #define __ASM_STAC ".byte 0x0f,0x01,0xcb" Both should not need separate binutils version info if added in a patch context.
