Le Fri, 7 Dec 2007 14:55:25 +0100, Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> Firstly, we dont need the 'offset' anymore because cpu_clock() maintains > offsets itself. Yes, but a lower quality one. __update_rq_clock tries to compensate large jumping clocks with a jiffy resolution, while my offset arranges for a very smooth frequency transition. I agree with keeping a single offset, but I liked the fact that with my patch on frequency change, the clock had no jump at all. > + * ns += offset to avoid sched_clock jumps with cpufreq I guess this needs to go away if I don't make my point :-( > + printk("CPU#%d: changed cyc2ns scale from %ld to %ld\n", > + cpu, prev_scale, *scale); Pointing it out just to be sure it does not end in the final version ;-) Thanks for cleaning up my mess ;-) -- Guillaume -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/