* Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > - t = printk_clock();
> > + t = cpu_clock(printk_cpu);
> > nanosec_rem = do_div(t, 1000000000);
> > tlen = sprintf(tbuf,
> > "<%c>[%5lu.%06lu] ",
>
> A bit risky - it's quite an expansion of code which no longer can call
> printk.
>
> You might want to take that WARN_ON out of __update_rq_clock() ;)
hm, dont we already detect printk recursions and turn them into a silent
return instead of a hang/crash?
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
