* Guillaume Chazarain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'll clean it up and resend it later. As I don't have the necessary
> knowledge to do the tsc_{32,64}.c unification, should I copy paste
> common functions into tsc_32.c and tsc_64.c to ease later unification
> or should I start a common .c file?
note that there are a couple of existing patches in this area. One is
the fix below. There's also older frequency-scaling TSC patches - i'll
try to dig them out.
Ingo
---------------->
Subject: x86: idle wakeup event in the HLT loop
From: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
do a proper idle-wakeup event on HLT as well - some CPUs stop the TSC
in HLT too, not just when going through the ACPI methods.
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Index: linux/arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c
+++ linux/arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c
@@ -113,10 +113,19 @@ void default_idle(void)
smp_mb();
local_irq_disable();
- if (!need_resched())
+ if (!need_resched()) {
+ ktime_t t0, t1;
+ u64 t0n, t1n;
+
+ t0 = ktime_get();
+ t0n = ktime_to_ns(t0);
safe_halt(); /* enables interrupts racelessly */
- else
- local_irq_enable();
+ local_irq_disable();
+ t1 = ktime_get();
+ t1n = ktime_to_ns(t1);
+ sched_clock_idle_wakeup_event(t1n - t0n);
+ }
+ local_irq_enable();
current_thread_info()->status |= TS_POLLING;
} else {
/* loop is done by the caller */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
