On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 13:37:57 +0100
Borislav Petkov <b...@alien8.de> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 01:50:37PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > Since the insn.prefixes.nbytes can be bigger than the size of
> > insn.prefixes.bytes[] when a same prefix is repeated, we have to
> > check whether the insn.prefixes.bytes[i] != 0 and i < 4 instead
> > of insn.prefixes.nbytes.
> > This introduces for_each_insn_prefix() macro for this purpose.
> >
> > Fixes: 2b1444983508 ("uprobes, mm, x86: Add the ability to install and
> > remove uprobes breakpoints")
> > Reported-by: syzbot+9b64b619f10f19d19...@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> > Debugged-by: Kees Cook <keesc...@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Srikar Dronamraju <sri...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhira...@kernel.org>
> > Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
> > ---
> > Changes in v2:
> > - Add for_each_insn_prefix() macro and fix to check index first.
> > ---
> > arch/x86/include/asm/insn.h | 15 +++++++++++++++
> > arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c | 10 ++++++----
> > 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> Warning: Kernel ABI header at 'tools/arch/x86/include/asm/insn.h' differs
> from latest version at 'arch/x86/include/asm/insn.h'
Oops.
>
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/insn.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/insn.h
> > index 5c1ae3eff9d4..e6b38ebd3a1c 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/insn.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/insn.h
> > @@ -201,6 +201,21 @@ static inline int insn_offset_immediate(struct insn
> > *insn)
> > return insn_offset_displacement(insn) + insn->displacement.nbytes;
> > }
> >
> > +/**
> > + * for_each_insn_prefix() -- Iterate prefixes in the instruction
> > + * @insn: Pointer to struct insn.
> > + * @idx: Index storage.
> > + * @prefix: Prefix byte.
> > + *
> > + * Iterate prefix bytes of given @insn. Each prefix byte is stored in
> > @prefix
> > + * and the index is stored in @idx (note that this @idx is just for a
> > cursor,
> > + * do not change it.)
> > + * Since prefixes.nbytes can be bigger than 4 if some prefixes are
> > repeated,
> > + * we can not use it for looping over the prefixes.
>
> Please use passive voice: no "we" or "I", etc,
OK.
>
> > + */
> > +#define for_each_insn_prefix(insn, idx, prefix) \
> > + for (idx = 0; idx < 4 && (prefix = insn->prefixes.bytes[idx]) != 0;
> > idx++)
>
> Btw, looking at the struct insn definition, that prefixes member should
> have a comment above it that those are the legacy prefixes which can be
> <= 4. But that's minor.
>
> In any case, I'll fix up the minor issues now but pls remember to do
> them in the future.
OK, I will add a macro with comment for it.
Thank you,
>
> Thx.
>
> --
> Regards/Gruss,
> Boris.
>
> https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
--
Masami Hiramatsu <mhira...@kernel.org>
