On 29/12/2025 16:38, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 12/29/25 4:26 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> One SDM845 board uses cx-supply, which is not allowed by the bindings,
>> as reported by dtbs_check:
>>
>> sdm845-samsung-starqltechn.dtb: remoteproc@5c00000 (qcom,sdm845-slpi-pas):
>> Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('cx-supply' was unexpected)
>>
>> The SDM845 SLPI binding already allows lcx and lmx domains, thus the
>> cx-supply seems like a fake name for something else, e.g. some
>> enable pin. The qcom_q6v5_pas.c driver parses cx-supply, so it is an
>> established ABI, therefore document it for this device only.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]>
>> ---
>
> fyi
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/cabtcjfbqoq1pmdou_17zov3mgtxd_2byay4ritqpvn5fydr...@mail.gmail.com/
>
> but this one seems to be more tightened, that's preferred
Heh... I think you need second or third pair of hands applying patches -
6 pages of patches with "New" status:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-msm/list/
Best regards,
Krzysztof
