On 04/03/2026 19:04, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
Since commit 9da3d1e912f3 ("block: Add core atomic write support"),
there is a gap in the blk_status_t codes and block status code 18 is
unused. This causes blk_status_to_errno() and blk_status_to_str() to
return incorrect values for that code.
Sure, we get the wrong value (for 18), but 18 does not match a valid
blk_status_t
Make the blk_status_t codes
consecutive again to avoid that.
Fixes: 9da3d1e912f3 ("block: Add core atomic write support")
Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: John Garry <[email protected]>
---
include/linux/blk_types.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/blk_types.h b/include/linux/blk_types.h
index 8808ee76e73c..89a722d76c28 100644
--- a/include/linux/blk_types.h
+++ b/include/linux/blk_types.h
@@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ typedef u16 blk_short_t;
/*
* Invalid size or alignment.
*/
-#define BLK_STS_INVAL ((__force blk_status_t)19)
+#define BLK_STS_INVAL ((__force blk_status_t)18)
/**
* blk_path_error - returns true if error may be path related
