> So, the same name + depth ?
>
> +---|-PHY+
> | | |
> | SerDes |
> | | |
> | PCS | component = PHY, name = "pcs", depth = 0
> | | |
> | MAC |
> | | |
> | packet |
> | buffer |
> | | |
> | MAC |
> | | |
> | PCS | component = PHY, name = "pcs", depth = 1
> | | |
> | PMA |
> | | |
> | PMD |
> +---|----+
> |
> v 10GBaseT
>
> For that we have what we need with phy_link_topology, as each PHY has
> its index, we should be good to go in that regard hopefully :)
So depth would be local to a component? We could have two PHY
components, each with a different index, and depth = 0?
I _think_ Jakub's depth was more at a global level? But then it would
need to be passed down as we do the enumeration.
Andrew
