On 3/17/26 02:14, Dan Williams wrote:
Alejandro Lucero Palau wrote:
[..]
This is not the first time I share my frustration, and as when I did so
in the past, I want to finish with a positive last sentence: I will keep
trying to get type2 support and hopefully further CXL stuff, and happy
to discuss the best way to do so with the CXL kernel community.
I did not mean to imply that the type-2 set was stuck behind a new
dependency. Apologies.
No worries.
It is next in the queue, it needs to go in next cycle with a high
priority.
In my view this confirmation that Smita's proposed patch addresses PJ's
test failure cleared one of the last hurdles for this set for me.
Did PJ tell you so? From his report that seemed a likely reason, but he
did not comment further after I told him about it.
