Alejandro Lucero Palau wrote: [..] > This is not the first time I share my frustration, and as when I did so > in the past, I want to finish with a positive last sentence: I will keep > trying to get type2 support and hopefully further CXL stuff, and happy > to discuss the best way to do so with the CXL kernel community.
I did not mean to imply that the type-2 set was stuck behind a new dependency. Apologies. It is next in the queue, it needs to go in next cycle with a high priority. In my view this confirmation that Smita's proposed patch addresses PJ's test failure cleared one of the last hurdles for this set for me.
