On 4/27/26 09:31, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Tue, Apr 21, 2026 at 07:32:34PM -0700, Mukesh R wrote:
Main change here is to rename hv_compose_msi_msg to
hv_vmbus_compose_msi_msg as we introduce hv_compose_msi_msg in upcoming
patches that builds MSI messages for both VMBus and non-VMBus cases. VMBus
is not used on baremetal root partition for example. While at it, replace
spaces with tabs and fix some formatting involving excessive line wraps.
Would be better to do the whitespace changes in their own patch,
although several of them should just be dropped (see below).
Capitalize subject ("PCI: hv: Rename ...").
Add "()" after function names in subject and commit log.
Ok, will do in next version.
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@
* function's configuration space is zero.
*
* The rest of this driver mostly maps PCI concepts onto underlying Hyper-V
- * facilities. For instance, the configuration space of a function exposed
+ * facilities. For instance, the configuration space of a function exposed
Oops, this hunk made it worse. Definitely don't want a tab there.
@@ -1954,7 +1955,7 @@ static void hv_compose_msi_msg(struct irq_data *data,
struct msi_msg *msg)
return;
}
/*
- * The vector we select here is a dummy value. The correct
+ * The vector we select here is a dummy value. The correct
Another tab that should be a space. Actually, you should just drop
this hunk; the rest of the comment has two spaces after periods, so
this should too.
well, most of our files does global replace 8 spaces with tabs, so
everywhere comments are well indented. Since, checkpatch doesn't complain
about tabs on comment lines, may I assue it is not a strict requirement
and more a nit or personal preference?
Thanks,
-Mukesh
@@ -2046,7 +2047,7 @@ static void hv_compose_msi_msg(struct irq_data *data,
struct msi_msg *msg)
/*
* Make sure that the ring buffer data structure doesn't get
- * freed while we dereference the ring buffer pointer. Test
+ * freed while we dereference the ring buffer pointer. Test
Same here. This makes it worse.
@@ -2226,7 +2227,7 @@ static int hv_pcie_init_irq_domain(struct
hv_pcibus_device *hbus)
/**
* get_bar_size() - Get the address space consumed by a BAR
* @bar_val: Value that a BAR returned after -1 was written
- * to it.
+ * to it.
Just put "to it" on the preceding line. There's plenty of space
there.
@@ -2580,7 +2581,7 @@ static void q_resource_requirements(void *context, struct
pci_response *resp,
* new_pcichild_device() - Create a new child device
* @hbus: The internal struct tracking this root PCI bus.
* @desc: The information supplied so far from the host
- * about the device.
+ * about the device.
Ditto. If you want to change this, put "about the device" on the
preceding line.
@@ -3422,7 +3423,7 @@ static int hv_allocate_config_window(struct
hv_pcibus_device *hbus)
* vmbus_allocate_mmio() gets used for allocating both device endpoint
* resource claims (those which cannot be overlapped) and the ranges
* which are valid for the children of this bus, which are intended
- * to be overlapped by those children. Set the flag on this claim
+ * to be overlapped by those children. Set the flag on this claim
Another hunk that should be dropped.