Constant pointer arithmetic on a PTR_TO_FLOW_KEYS register lands the
constant in reg->var_off (e.g. flow_keys(imm=4096)), but the
PTR_TO_FLOW_KEYS path in check_mem_access() passes only insn->off to
check_flow_keys_access() and never folds reg->var_off.value.  The
verifier therefore accepts an access that, at runtime, dereferences past
struct bpf_flow_keys -- a verifier/runtime divergence that yields an
out-of-bounds read and write of kernel stack memory.

Commit 022ac0750883 ("bpf: use reg->var_off instead of reg->off for
pointers") removed the generic "off += reg->off" that check_mem_access()
applied before the per-type dispatch and replaced it with per-path
folding of reg->var_off.value (for example the ctx path now folds the
register offset via check_ctx_access()).  The PTR_TO_FLOW_KEYS path was
not given the equivalent fold, so a constant offset that used to be
folded and rejected is now silently accepted:

  before 022ac0750883: the offset stays in reg->off and is folded
    generically, so the access is checked with off=4096 and rejected.
  after  022ac0750883: the offset lands in reg->var_off, the flow_keys
    path checks off=0 and accepts; at runtime the access dereferences
    base + 0x1000.

For a BPF_PROG_TYPE_FLOW_DISSECTOR program the following is accepted:

  r2 = *(u64 *)(r1 + 144)   ; R2=flow_keys (PTR_TO_FLOW_KEYS)
  r2 += 0x1000              ; R2=flow_keys(imm=4096), accepted
  r0 = *(u64 *)(r2 + 0)     ; accepted, var_off.value=0x1000 ignored

while the equivalent insn->off form

  r0 = *(u64 *)(r2 + 0x1000)

has the same effective offset but is correctly rejected with
"invalid access to flow keys off=4096 size=8", which isolates the defect
to the missing var_off fold.  Once attached as a flow dissector, the
accepted program reads kernel stack past struct bpf_flow_keys (a
kernel-stack / KASLR information leak) and can likewise write past it,
corrupting kernel memory.

Fix it by folding reg->var_off.value into the offset before the bounds
check and rejecting non-constant offsets, mirroring the other pointer
types (e.g. check_ctx_access()).

No released kernel is affected; the regression is confined to the 7.1
development cycle (reproduced on v7.1-rc1..rc5), and v7.0.x rejects the
program above.

Fixes: 022ac0750883 ("bpf: use reg->var_off instead of reg->off for pointers")
Signed-off-by: Nuoqi Gui <[email protected]>
---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 18 +++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 935595138aa0..68ddd465584c 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -4728,9 +4728,21 @@ static int check_ctx_access(struct bpf_verifier_env 
*env, int insn_idx, struct b
        return err;
 }
 
-static int check_flow_keys_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int off,
-                                 int size)
+static int check_flow_keys_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
+                                 struct bpf_reg_state *reg, argno_t argno,
+                                 int off, int size)
 {
+       /* Only a constant offset is allowed here; fold it into off. */
+       if (!tnum_is_const(reg->var_off)) {
+               char tn_buf[48];
+
+               tnum_strn(tn_buf, sizeof(tn_buf), reg->var_off);
+               verbose(env, "%s invalid variable offset to flow keys: off=%d, 
var_off=%s\n",
+                       reg_arg_name(env, argno), off, tn_buf);
+               return -EACCES;
+       }
+       off += reg->var_off.value;
+
        if (size < 0 || off < 0 ||
            (u64)off + size > sizeof(struct bpf_flow_keys)) {
                verbose(env, "invalid access to flow keys off=%d size=%d\n",
@@ -6239,7 +6251,7 @@ static int check_mem_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, 
int insn_idx, struct b
                        return -EACCES;
                }
 
-               err = check_flow_keys_access(env, off, size);
+               err = check_flow_keys_access(env, reg, argno, off, size);
                if (!err && t == BPF_READ && value_regno >= 0)
                        mark_reg_unknown(env, regs, value_regno);
        } else if (type_is_sk_pointer(reg->type)) {

-- 
2.34.1


Reply via email to