Add verifier tests covering pointer arithmetic on a PTR_TO_FLOW_KEYS
register. This covers the bpf-next regression where an out-of-bounds
constant offset introduced as flow_keys += K and then dereferenced at
insn->off 0 was accepted, while the equivalent flow_keys + K direct offset
was rejected.

The tests check that in-bounds constant arithmetic on the keys pointer is
still accepted, out-of-bounds constant arithmetic is rejected for both read
and write, and a truly varying offset from bpf_get_prandom_u32() remains
rejected by the existing PTR_TO_FLOW_KEYS pointer arithmetic rules.

Signed-off-by: Nuoqi Gui <[email protected]>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c  |  2 +
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_flow_keys.c       | 97 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 99 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c 
b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
index 89779d897aba..8a3d69e2453c 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
@@ -38,6 +38,7 @@
 #include "verifier_div0.skel.h"
 #include "verifier_div_mod_bounds.skel.h"
 #include "verifier_div_overflow.skel.h"
+#include "verifier_flow_keys.skel.h"
 #include "verifier_global_subprogs.skel.h"
 #include "verifier_global_ptr_args.skel.h"
 #include "verifier_gotol.skel.h"
@@ -190,6 +191,7 @@ void test_verifier_direct_stack_access_wraparound(void) { 
RUN(verifier_direct_st
 void test_verifier_div0(void)                 { RUN(verifier_div0); }
 void test_verifier_div_mod_bounds(void)       { RUN(verifier_div_mod_bounds); }
 void test_verifier_div_overflow(void)         { RUN(verifier_div_overflow); }
+void test_verifier_flow_keys(void)            { RUN(verifier_flow_keys); }
 void test_verifier_global_subprogs(void)      { RUN(verifier_global_subprogs); 
}
 void test_verifier_global_ptr_args(void)      { RUN(verifier_global_ptr_args); 
}
 void test_verifier_gotol(void)                { RUN(verifier_gotol); }
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_flow_keys.c 
b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_flow_keys.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..d780a36a6e9a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_flow_keys.c
@@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Bounds checks for PTR_TO_FLOW_KEYS pointer arithmetic. */
+
+#include "vmlinux.h"
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include "bpf_misc.h"
+
+/* sizeof(struct bpf_flow_keys) is well under 4096, so +0x1000 is OOB. */
+
+SEC("flow_dissector")
+__description("flow_keys: in-bounds constant pointer arithmetic accepted")
+__success
+__naked void flow_keys_const_inbounds(void)
+{
+       asm volatile ("                                 \
+       r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 + %[flow_keys]);               \
+       r1 += 8;                                        \
+       r0 = *(u64 *)(r1 + 0);                          \
+       r0 = 0;                                         \
+       exit;                                           \
+"      :
+       : __imm_const(flow_keys, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, flow_keys))
+       : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("flow_dissector")
+__description("flow_keys: OOB via constant pointer arithmetic rejected")
+__failure __msg("invalid access to flow keys off=4096 size=8")
+__naked void flow_keys_const_oob_read(void)
+{
+       asm volatile ("                                 \
+       r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 + %[flow_keys]);               \
+       r1 += 4096;                                     \
+       r0 = *(u64 *)(r1 + 0);                          \
+       r0 = 0;                                         \
+       exit;                                           \
+"      :
+       : __imm_const(flow_keys, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, flow_keys))
+       : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("flow_dissector")
+__description("flow_keys: OOB write via constant pointer arithmetic rejected")
+__failure __msg("invalid access to flow keys off=4096 size=8")
+__naked void flow_keys_const_oob_write(void)
+{
+       asm volatile ("                                 \
+       r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 + %[flow_keys]);               \
+       r1 += 4096;                                     \
+       r2 = 0;                                         \
+       *(u64 *)(r1 + 0) = r2;                          \
+       r0 = 0;                                         \
+       exit;                                           \
+"      :
+       : __imm_const(flow_keys, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, flow_keys))
+       : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+/* Equivalent OOB expressed directly in insn->off; this form was always
+ * rejected and is kept to show both forms now share one diagnostic.
+ */
+SEC("flow_dissector")
+__description("flow_keys: OOB via insn->off rejected")
+__failure __msg("invalid access to flow keys off=4096 size=8")
+__naked void flow_keys_insn_off_oob(void)
+{
+       asm volatile ("                                 \
+       r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 + %[flow_keys]);               \
+       r0 = *(u64 *)(r1 + 4096);                       \
+       r0 = 0;                                         \
+       exit;                                           \
+"      :
+       : __imm_const(flow_keys, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, flow_keys))
+       : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("flow_dissector")
+__description("flow_keys: variable pointer arithmetic rejected")
+__failure __msg("R1 pointer arithmetic on flow_keys prohibited")
+__naked void flow_keys_var_read(void)
+{
+       asm volatile ("                                 \
+       r6 = r1;                                        \
+       call %[bpf_get_prandom_u32];                    \
+       r0 &= 0xFFFF;                                   \
+       r1 = *(u64 *)(r6 + %[flow_keys]);               \
+       r1 += r0;                                       \
+       r0 = *(u64 *)(r1 + 0);                          \
+       r0 = 0;                                         \
+       exit;                                           \
+"      :
+       : __imm_const(flow_keys, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, flow_keys)),
+         __imm(bpf_get_prandom_u32)
+       : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";

-- 
2.34.1


Reply via email to