On Thu, Aug 06, 2026 at 09:04:11AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > Would it be clearer to state "no functional change intended" ...?
Agreed - with the existing dma_dev equality check, rq->vq and sq->vq are equivalent for this unmap today. I will drop this as a standalone "fix" and fold the sq->vq symmetry into the v2 series with an explicit no-functional-change note (no Fixes: tag for that part). Thanks, Xiong Weimin
