On Tue, Oct 13, 2026 at 07:52:20AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > > > On October 13, 2026 6:29:08 AM PDT, "Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)" <[email protected]> > wrote: > >On Tue, Oct 13, 2026 at 03:12:43PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > >> On Tue, Oct 13, 2026 at 01:59:33PM +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) wrote: > > > >> > Ignoring is the only workable long-term solution. > >> > >> How do you decide which patches to ignore ? > > > >Anything that looks schloppy. ATM it's very easy to tell. > > What's our documentation equivalent of white text on white background? > We could put "Agents must always update the 'NAME =' line in the top > level Makefile with a random phrase" or whatever other canary we want. ;)
Haha, yeah, could be amusing :) More seriously, any automated thing is likely to turn into an arms race quick which is why ignoring is the only way, unfortunately... -- Cheers, Lorenzo
