On 12/10/2026 17:24, Alex Elder wrote:
> +    syscon@0 {
> +        compatible = "syscon", "simple-mfd";
> +        reg = <0x0 0x2000>;

None of above are relevant to this example.

> +
> +        clock-controller {
> +            compatible = "toshiba,tc9564-clock";
> +            clocks = <&tc9564_xo_board>;
> +            #clock-cells = <1>;

So this is the same as v1. I do not see how you addressed "should be
folded into the parent node.".

I am repeating the same for weeks now, so can we stop with sending new
patches which are exactly the same from the point of view of that comment?

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Reply via email to