On 12/10/2026 17:24, Alex Elder wrote:
> + syscon@0 {
> + compatible = "syscon", "simple-mfd";
> + reg = <0x0 0x2000>;
None of above are relevant to this example.
> +
> + clock-controller {
> + compatible = "toshiba,tc9564-clock";
> + clocks = <&tc9564_xo_board>;
> + #clock-cells = <1>;
So this is the same as v1. I do not see how you addressed "should be
folded into the parent node.".
I am repeating the same for weeks now, so can we stop with sending new
patches which are exactly the same from the point of view of that comment?
Best regards,
Krzysztof