On 2/18/08, Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Paolo Ciarrocchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > /*
> > > - * Set up an actual MCR
> > > + * Set up an actual MCR
> > > */
> >
> > This was not highlighted by checkpatch.pl, right? The same applies for
> > a few other "fix" you did on some comments.
>
> correct - it's not fixes, just bringing it in line with the common
> comment style we use. The file was using lots of inconsistent comment
> styles.
Ok, that's something i'll verify when i'll work on a new file.
> > [...]
> > > {
> > > - u32 mem = ramtop();
> > > u32 root = power2(mem);
> > > + u32 mem = ramtop();
> >
> > Can you please explain the rationale behind this change?
>
> it's a bug :) It got pointed out by Joe Perches and i fixed it. (the
> size check would have caught it too)
oh, i see now :-)
> > > - E2MMX = 1<<19,
> > > - EAMD3D = 1<<20,
> > > - };
> >
> > I see why you did the cleanup but I think even this part was not
> > catched by checkpatch.pl
>
> yes, as i said:
>
> > > Some of them are real CodingStyle problems, some of them are just
> > > arbitrary taste details.
>
> checkpatch.pl is a helper tool which highlights some of the clear
> problem - but when we clean up files we try to make it appear consistent
> in all its details. My patch was a demonstration of what else can be
> fixed in a file until it's really clean looking in its entirety.
Fair enought, i just want to try to improve checkpatch.pl while using it :-)
ciao,
--
Paolo
http://paolo.ciarrocchi.googlepages.com/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
