On Fri 10-08-12 21:21:15, Hillf Danton wrote: > On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 9:16 PM, Michal Hocko <mho...@suse.cz> wrote: > > Subject: [PATCH] hugetlb: do not use vma_hugecache_offset for > > vma_prio_tree_foreach > > > > 0c176d5 (mm: hugetlb: fix pgoff computation when unmapping page > > from vma) fixed pgoff calculation but it has replaced it by > > vma_hugecache_offset which is not approapriate for offsets used for > > vma_prio_tree_foreach because that one expects index in page units > > rather than in huge_page_shift. > > Using vma_hugecache_offset is not incorrect because the pgoff will fit > > into the same vmas but it is confusing. > > > > Well, how is the patch tested?
It's been compile tested because it only restores the previous code with a simple and obvious bug fix. Do you see any issue in the patch? > > Cc: Hillf Danton <dhi...@gmail.com> > > Cc: Mel Gorman <m...@csn.ul.ie> > > Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hir...@jp.fujitsu.com> > > Cc: David Rientjes <rient...@google.com> > > Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mho...@suse.cz> > > --- > > mm/hugetlb.c | 3 ++- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c > > index c39e4be..a74ea31 100644 > > --- a/mm/hugetlb.c > > +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c > > @@ -2462,7 +2462,8 @@ static int unmap_ref_private(struct mm_struct *mm, > > struct vm_area_struct *vma, > > * from page cache lookup which is in HPAGE_SIZE units. > > */ > > address = address & huge_page_mask(h); > > - pgoff = vma_hugecache_offset(h, vma, address); > > + pgoff = ((address - vma->vm_start) >> PAGE_SHIFT) + > > + vma->vm_pgoff; > > mapping = vma->vm_file->f_dentry->d_inode->i_mapping; > > > > /* > > -- > > 1.7.10.4 > > > > > > -- > > Michal Hocko > > SUSE Labs -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/