On 9/27/2012 7:24 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
On 09/25/2012 05:06 AM, ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 6:45 PM, Rob Herring <robherri...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 09/06/2012 09:57 AM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
All phy related programming like enabling/disabling the clocks, powering
on/off the phy is taken care of by this driver. It is also used for OTG
related functionality like srp.
This also includes device tree support for usb2 phy driver and
the documentation with device tree binding information is updated.
Currently writing to control module register is taken care in this
driver which will be removed once the control module driver is in place.
Cc: Felipe Balbi <ba...@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kis...@ti.com>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/usb-phy.txt | 17 ++
drivers/usb/phy/Kconfig | 9 +
drivers/usb/phy/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/usb/phy/omap-usb2.c | 271 +++++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/usb/omap_usb.h | 46 ++++
include/linux/usb/phy_companion.h | 34 +++
6 files changed, 378 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/usb-phy.txt
create mode 100644 drivers/usb/phy/omap-usb2.c
create mode 100644 include/linux/usb/omap_usb.h
create mode 100644 include/linux/usb/phy_companion.h
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/usb-phy.txt
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/usb-phy.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..80d4148
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/usb-phy.txt
This is a very generic name...
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+USB PHY
+
+OMAP USB2 PHY
+
+Required properties:
+ - compatible: Should be "ti,omap-usb2"
...for a specific phy. However, I do think a generic binding to describe
host ctrlr to phy connections is needed.
+ - reg : Address and length of the register set for the device. Also
+add the address of control module dev conf register until a driver for
+control module is added
The dts should describe the h/w, not what you need for the current
driver. The 2nd reg field does not belong here.
Indeed. This was discussed and agreed upon as a interim solution till
we have a control module driver in place to write to the control
module register.
Discussed where and agreed by who? I for one do not agree.
Yeah, what was tolerated was the addition of that address inside hwmod
data, but I do agree that it should not go into DTS.
Regards,
Benoit
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
