On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 12:16:46PM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote: > On Mon, 2012-10-01 at 11:03 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Have you reported this bug in GCC? > No I haven't. Since you ask, I guess you too think 'ret' is always set > when this function returns, don't you? Ie, my analysis isn't obviously > wrong. I haven't actually stared hard enough at the code to figure this out yet but given what you're changing I'd hope it's a flow analysis bug. I'm certainly not seeing a warning here. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/