In calling of __fat_write_inode(inode, wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_ALL),
expression "wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_ALL" will always be equivalent to value
of wbc->sync_mode. So, remove this additional compare condition from function
arguments.
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinj...@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Amit Sahrawat <amit.sahrawa...@gmail.com>
---
fs/fat/inode.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/fat/inode.c b/fs/fat/inode.c
index 7b186a5..aa0138b 100644
--- a/fs/fat/inode.c
+++ b/fs/fat/inode.c
@@ -678,7 +678,7 @@ static int fat_write_inode(struct inode *inode, struct
writeback_control *wbc)
err = fat_clusters_flush(sb);
mutex_unlock(&MSDOS_SB(sb)->s_lock);
} else
- err = __fat_write_inode(inode, wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_ALL);
+ err = __fat_write_inode(inode, wbc->sync_mode);
return err;
}
--
1.7.9.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
