2012/11/12, OGAWA Hirofumi <hirof...@mail.parknet.co.jp>: > OGAWA Hirofumi <hirof...@mail.parknet.co.jp> writes: > >> Namjae Jeon <linkinj...@gmail.com> writes: >> >>> 2012/11/12, OGAWA Hirofumi <hirof...@mail.parknet.co.jp>: >>>> Namjae Jeon <linkinj...@gmail.com> writes: >>>> >>>>> Correctly update modification and status change time in case of >>>>> file/directory removal and creation. >>>> >>>> This changelog just explain "what", and it doesn't explain "why". >>>> Please >>>> explain why we need this change. >>>> >>>> IIRC, timestamp handling in FAT driver is strange historically. Anyway, >>>> FAT doesn't have "inode change time". It is "creation time" in FAT. >>> Hi. OGAWA. >>> I made this patch after comparing timestamp handlings with MSDOS and >>> XFS. >>> Should timestamp handling of FAT be same with MSDOS ? >>> Am I missing ? >> >> What was difference with XFS, FAT, and MSDOS? Okay, the description of patch was lacked, So I will resend patch with specifical test reseult with other filesystem. > > BTW, I recall I checked this, and yes, it is strange. But it is historical. "historical" means It is difficult to change ?
Thanks. > -- > OGAWA Hirofumi <hirof...@mail.parknet.co.jp> > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
