OGAWA Hirofumi <[email protected]> writes: > Namjae Jeon <[email protected]> writes: > >>>> What was difference with XFS, FAT, and MSDOS? >> Okay, the description of patch was lacked, So I will resend patch with >> specifical test reseult with other filesystem. >>> >>> BTW, I recall I checked this, and yes, it is strange. But it is historical. >> "historical" means It is difficult to change ? > > The timestamp handling was not same with unix fs from initial, and FAT > doesn't have inode change timestamp. This historical reason it is not > better to change to same with unix fs, and never be possible to support > inode change timestamp cleanly.
I.e. the user visible change without strong reason is the wrong. -- OGAWA Hirofumi <[email protected]> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
