Namjae Jeon <[email protected]> writes: > 2012/11/12, OGAWA Hirofumi <[email protected]>: >> Namjae Jeon <[email protected]> writes: >> >>> Correctly update modification and status change time in case of >>> file/directory removal and creation. >> >> This changelog just explain "what", and it doesn't explain "why". Please >> explain why we need this change. >> >> IIRC, timestamp handling in FAT driver is strange historically. Anyway, >> FAT doesn't have "inode change time". It is "creation time" in FAT. > Hi. OGAWA. > I made this patch after comparing timestamp handlings with MSDOS and XFS. > Should timestamp handling of FAT be same with MSDOS ? > Am I missing ?
What was difference with XFS, FAT, and MSDOS? -- OGAWA Hirofumi <[email protected]> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
