On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 06:31:10PM +0000, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
> @@ -5138,6 +5224,10 @@ select_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int 
> prev_cpu, int sd_flag, int wake_f
>               prev_cpu = cpu;
>  
>       if (sd_flag & SD_BALANCE_WAKE) {
> +             if (energy_aware()) {
> +                     new_cpu = energy_aware_wake_cpu(p);
> +                     goto unlock;
> +             }
>               new_cpu = select_idle_sibling(p, prev_cpu);
>               goto unlock;
>       }

So that is fundamentally wrong I think. We only care about power aware
scheduling when U < 1, after that we should do the normal thing. This
setup does not allow for that.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to