On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 06:31:10PM +0000, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
> +static int energy_aware_wake_cpu(struct task_struct *p)
> +{
> +     struct sched_domain *sd;
> +     struct sched_group *sg, *sg_target;
> +     int target_max_cap = SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE;
> +     int target_cpu = task_cpu(p);
> +     int i;
> +
> +     sd = rcu_dereference(per_cpu(sd_ea, task_cpu(p)));
> +
> +     if (!sd)
> +             return -1;
> +
> +     sg = sd->groups;
> +     sg_target = sg;
> +     /* Find group with sufficient capacity */
> +     do {
> +             int sg_max_capacity = group_max_capacity(sg);
> +
> +             if (sg_max_capacity >= task_utilization(p) &&
> +                             sg_max_capacity <= target_max_cap) {
> +                     sg_target = sg;
> +                     target_max_cap = sg_max_capacity;
> +             }
> +     } while (sg = sg->next, sg != sd->groups);
> +
> +     /* Find cpu with sufficient capacity */
> +     for_each_cpu_and(i, tsk_cpus_allowed(p), sched_group_cpus(sg_target)) {
> +             int new_usage = get_cpu_usage(i) + task_utilization(p);
> +
> +             if (new_usage > capacity_orig_of(i))
> +                     continue;
> +
> +             if (new_usage < capacity_curr_of(i)) {
> +                     target_cpu = i;
> +                     if (!cpu_rq(i)->nr_running)
> +                             break;
> +             }
> +
> +             /* cpu has capacity at higher OPP, keep it as fallback */
> +             if (target_cpu == task_cpu(p))
> +                     target_cpu = i;
> +     }
> +
> +     if (target_cpu != task_cpu(p)) {
> +             struct energy_env eenv = {
> +                     .usage_delta    = task_utilization(p),
> +                     .src_cpu        = task_cpu(p),
> +                     .dst_cpu        = target_cpu,
> +             };
> +
> +             /* Not enough spare capacity on previous cpu */
> +             if (cpu_overutilized(task_cpu(p), sd))
> +                     return target_cpu;
> +
> +             if (energy_diff(&eenv) >= 0)
> +                     return task_cpu(p);
> +     }
> +
> +     return target_cpu;
> +}

So while you have some cpufreq -> sched coupling (the capacity_curr
thing) this would be the site where you could provide sched -> cpufreq
coupling, right?

So does it make sense to at least put in the right hooks now? I realize
we'll likely take cpufreq out back and feed it to the bears but
something managing P states will be there whatever we'll call the new
fangled thing and this would be the place to hook it still.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to