On Sat, May 23 2015, Shailendra Verma wrote: > Signed-off-by: Shailendra Verma <[email protected]> Acked-by: Michal Nazarewicz <[email protected]>
> --- > mm/cma.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/mm/cma.c b/mm/cma.c > index 3a7a67b..6612780 100644 > --- a/mm/cma.c > +++ b/mm/cma.c > @@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ int __init cma_init_reserved_mem(phys_addr_t base, > phys_addr_t size, > if (!size || !memblock_is_region_reserved(base, size)) > return -EINVAL; > > - /* ensure minimal alignment requied by mm core */ > + /* ensure minimal alignment required by mm core */ > alignment = PAGE_SIZE << max(MAX_ORDER - 1, pageblock_order); > > /* alignment should be aligned with order_per_bit */ > @@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ int __init cma_declare_contiguous(phys_addr_t base, > /* > * high_memory isn't direct mapped memory so retrieving its physical > * address isn't appropriate. But it would be useful to check the > - * physical address of the highmem boundary so it's justfiable to get > + * physical address of the highmem boundary so it's justifiable to get > * the physical address from it. On x86 there is a validation check for > * this case, so the following workaround is needed to avoid it. > */ > -- > 1.7.9.5 > -- Best regards, _ _ .o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of o' \,=./ `o ..o | Computer Science, Michał “mina86” Nazarewicz (o o) ooo +--<[email protected]>--<xmpp:[email protected]>--ooO--(_)--Ooo-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
