On Tue, 2025-12-09 at 09:33 +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote: > So even if the deblob scripts will disappear, running a diff between > the linux-libre tarball that you publish and the upstream linux > kernel code, then applying that patch during build, will result in > the same input source for the build process. So I think this > approach of doing a "delta" package can continue to work even if the > deblob scripts would disappear.
Except not so much: On Mon, 2025-12-08 at 04:51 -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > ...but publishing such scripts is probably not going to work, > freedom-wise. We currently have diffs that don't get published because the diffs contain the problematic stuff being deleted. Sharing them means also sharing that.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ linux-libre mailing list [email protected] http://www.fsfla.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-libre
