On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 20:13, Thorsten Glaser <[email protected]> wrote:
> Geert Uytterhoeven dixit:
>>  3. If there's anything left that you really need, please tell us, so
>>"we" can get it in a good shape for v2.6.40.
>
> OK. While I don’t strictly need it, I can think of these:
> • Reclaim chip RAM on Amiga

Nobody cares about 4 KiB of Chip RAM, especially not if you have to piss off the
Debian Kernel Team to have it now instead of in a few months :-)

> • Reserve ST RAM early

Yeah, that's a valid one,
My (and probably lkml's) main issue there is that it introduces yet
another custom
allocator. Can we avoid that?

> I’m Bcc’ing the Debian Kernel person I was talking to, so we may
> get an agreement. I’ll revisit your gitweb later then, to see
> which patches you actually schedule for Linus, and try to get
> them into Debian.

As for-2.6.39 got rebased in the mean time, you have to compare
m68k-v2.6.38 with m68k-queue to see what's (not yet) upstream.

And to back up Christian: keep up the good work!

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [email protected]

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to