Hi Marek, On Sat, 2018-04-07 at 15:04 +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > The BT1120 interlaced CCIR codes are the same as BT656 ones > and different than BT656 progressive CCIR codes, fix this.
thank you for the patch, and sorry for the delay. > Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <[email protected]> > Cc: Steve Longerbeam <[email protected]> > Cc: Philipp Zabel <[email protected]> > --- > drivers/gpu/ipu-v3/ipu-csi.c | 8 ++++++-- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/ipu-v3/ipu-csi.c b/drivers/gpu/ipu-v3/ipu-csi.c > index caa05b0702e1..301a729581ce 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/ipu-v3/ipu-csi.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/ipu-v3/ipu-csi.c > @@ -435,12 +435,16 @@ int ipu_csi_init_interface(struct ipu_csi *csi, > break; > case IPU_CSI_CLK_MODE_CCIR1120_PROGRESSIVE_DDR: > case IPU_CSI_CLK_MODE_CCIR1120_PROGRESSIVE_SDR: > - case IPU_CSI_CLK_MODE_CCIR1120_INTERLACED_DDR: > - case IPU_CSI_CLK_MODE_CCIR1120_INTERLACED_SDR: > ipu_csi_write(csi, 0x40030 | CSI_CCIR_ERR_DET_EN, > CSI_CCIR_CODE_1); > ipu_csi_write(csi, 0xFF0000, CSI_CCIR_CODE_3); > break; > + case IPU_CSI_CLK_MODE_CCIR1120_INTERLACED_DDR: > + case IPU_CSI_CLK_MODE_CCIR1120_INTERLACED_SDR: > + ipu_csi_write(csi, 0x40596 | CSI_CCIR_ERR_DET_EN, > CSI_CCIR_CODE_1); > + ipu_csi_write(csi, 0xD07DF, CSI_CCIR_CODE_2); > + ipu_csi_write(csi, 0xFF0000, CSI_CCIR_CODE_3); If these are the same as BT656 codes (so this case would be for PAL?), could this just be moved up into the IPU_CSI_CLK_MODE_CCIR656_INTERLACED case? Would the NTSC CCIR codes be the same as well? regards Philipp
