On Wed, 11 Mar 2009, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> Camera sensors have a native bus width say support, but on some
> boards not all sensor data lines are connected to the image
> interface and thus support a different bus width than the sensors
> native one. Some boards even have a bus driver which dynamically
> switches between different bus widths with a GPIO.
>
> This patch adds a hook which board code can use to support different
> bus widths.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <[email protected]>
> ---
> include/media/soc_camera.h | 6 ++++++
> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/media/soc_camera.h b/include/media/soc_camera.h
> index 7440d92..d68959c 100644
> --- a/include/media/soc_camera.h
> +++ b/include/media/soc_camera.h
> @@ -100,6 +100,12 @@ struct soc_camera_link {
> /* Optional callbacks to power on or off and reset the sensor */
> int (*power)(struct device *, int);
> int (*reset)(struct device *);
> + /* some platforms may support different data widths than the sensors
> + * native ones due to different data line routing. Let the board code
> + * overwrite the width flags.
> + */
Please, format the comment according to CodingStyle:
/*
* some
* comment
*/
I know, I have some non-conforming (similar to yours) comments in
soc-camera .c files, but this header is "clean" so far:-) Let's keep it
that way.
> + int (*set_bus_param)(struct device *, unsigned long flags);
> + unsigned long (*query_bus_param)(struct device *);
Wouldn't the first parameter of type "struct soc_camera_link *" make more
sense? I'll also then change .power and .reset similarly.
> };
>
> static inline struct soc_camera_device *to_soc_camera_dev(struct device *dev)
> --
> 1.5.6.5
>
Thanks
Guennadi
---
Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D.
Freelance Open-Source Software Developer
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
